Do Railroad Sidings Use Much Ballast

So the wuestion is now do i just use the same thickness for mainline and siding or should the siding and spurs be the same thickness which in turn would match their height.

Do railroad sidings use much ballast.

Capturing the effect is a big part of realism too. Maybe the main and siding looked much alike when first built as it isn t necessarily cost. So again if you go with larger ballast spend some time avoiding the worst visual consequences of having it stick in defiance of gravity to the side of. Minimal to no ballast.

The point above about lawyers and nimbys is well taken. Then you include extra costs for railroad retirement fela benefit packages etc and it adds up to a tidy sum to pay for a crew to install a mile of track much more than the value of the materials involved. The typical model railroad approach of using lighter ballast on the main represents some prototypes ok but definitely not all. Sidings often have lighter rails meant for lower speed or less heavy traffic and few if any signals.

While for mainline and sidings i have used woodland scenics fine gray ballast i have yet to decide what to use on yard tracks. It is used to bear the load from the railroad ties to facilitate drainage of water and also to keep down vegetation that might interfere with the track structure. Industrial spur ballast or lack thereof is another matter entirely. A siding in rail terminology is a low speed track section distinct from a running line or through route such as a main line or branch line or spur it may connect to through track or to other sidings at either end.

Railroad wages are very close to the highest for blue collar workers. Sooner or later i will have to deal with ballast in my yard. It also helps to know how things get the way they are. Anyone maybe joe knows what did he used.

So slightly lower siding which can be done with using n scale sized roadbed versus the main. As a rule sidings are at a lower level than the main in part to prevent cars from rolling from siding to main. More vegetation on the track and between ties. I pretty much like how the roseburg yard appears on joe s siskiyou line layout.

Ballast also holds the track in place as the trains roll over it. Having said that covered hoppers are among the cars that have gotten bigger and heavier in recent years so perhaps a food based industry would have had its siding get new rail and thus. I do grasp the wisdom of almost having to use too large ballast on the main so that you can have smaller ballast on sidings and in yards. Many industrial sidings started with cinder ballast but over time dirt built up around the rails so if you look at most industrial.

Passing siding would get stone ballast but that track was rarely cleaned so the stone ballast soon was hard to distinguish from cinder ballast. It is packed between below and around the ties. And if that work is done by a railroad contractor and not the railroad itself there is no reason they d use the same ballast source as the railroad itself.